Instead of "US alert as China's cash buys inroads in Caribbean," I'd be tempted to say, "US snoozes as Chinese start to buy up all the chips and build bonds with Caribbean leadership -- especially the Cubans."
US alert as China's cash buys inroads in Caribbean'They are buying loyalty and taking up the vacuum left by the United States, Canada and other countries,' former diplomat says
NASSAU, the Bahamas — A brand new $35 million stadium opened here in the Bahamas a few weeks ago, a gift from the Chinese government. The tiny island nation of Dominica has received a grammar school, a renovated hospital and a sports stadium, also courtesy of the Chinese. Antigua and Barbuda got a power plant and a cricket stadium, and a new school is on its way. The prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago can thank Chinese contractors for the craftsmanship in her official residence.China’s economic might has rolled up to America’s doorstep in the Caribbean, with a flurry of loans from state banks, investments by companies and outright gifts from the government in the form of new stadiums, roads, official buildings, ports and resorts in a region where the United States has long been a prime benefactor.
The Chinese have flexed their economic prowess in nearly every corner of the world. But planting a flag so close to the United States has generated intense vetting — and some raised eyebrows — among diplomats, economists and investors.
“When you’ve got a new player in the hemisphere all of a sudden, it’s obviously something talked about at the highest level of governments,” said Kevin P. Gallagher, a Boston University professor who is an author of a recent report on Chinese financing, “The New Banks in Town.”
Most analysts do not see a security threat, noting that the Chinese are not building bases or forging any military ties that could invoke fears of another Cuban missile crisis. But they do see an emerging superpower securing economic inroads and political support from a bloc of developing countries with anemic budgets that once counted almost exclusively on the United States, Canada and Europe.China announced late last year that it would lend $6.3 billion to Caribbean governments, adding considerably to the hundreds of millions of dollars in loans, grants and other forms of economic assistance it has already channeled there in the past decade.Unlike in Africa, South America and other parts of the world where China’s forays are largely driven by a search for commodities, its presence in the Caribbean derives mainly from long-term economic ventures, like tourism and loans, and potential new allies that are inexpensive to win over, analysts say.
'Strategic move'
American diplomatic cables released through WikiLeaks and published in the British newspaper The Guardian quoted diplomats as being increasingly worried about the Chinese presence here “less than 190 miles from the United States” and speculating on its purpose. One theory, according to a 2003 cable, suggested that China was lining up allies as “a strategic move” for the eventual end of the Castro era in Cuba, with which it has strong relations.
But the public line today is to be untroubled. “I am not particularly worried, but it is something the U.S. should continue to monitor,” said Dennis C. Shea, the chairman of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a bipartisan Congressional panel. But, he added, “With China you have to be wary of possible policy goals behind the effort.”
This archipelago, less than a one-hour flight from Florida, has gotten particular attention from the Chinese. Aside from the new stadium, with its “China Aid” plaque affixed prominently at the entrance, Chinese workers here in the Bahamas are busy helping build the $3.5 billion Baha Mar, one of the region’s largest megaresorts.
Beyond that, a Chinese state bank agreed in recent weeks to put up $41 million for a new port and bridge, and a new, large Chinese Embassy is being built downtown.
The new stadium here, Bahamian officials said, was in part a reward for breaking ties with Taiwan in 1997 and establishing and keeping relations with China.
It is one of several sporting arenas that China has sprinkled in Caribbean and Central American nations as gratitude for their recognition of “one China” — in other words, for their refusal to recognize Taiwan, which Chinese officials consider part of their country.
“They offered a substantial gift and we opted for a national stadium,” said Charles Maynard, the Bahamian sports minister, adding that his government could never have afforded to build it on its own.
Tug of war
In this enduring tug of war with Taiwan, others have switched, too, with a little financial encouragement. Grenada ended relations with Taiwan in 2004, and it is now in talks with China about getting a new national track and field stadium. The parting has not been entirely amicable; Taiwan and Grenada are now locked in a financial dispute over loans that Grenada received to finance the construction of its airport.
Natural Resources Management
24 Rogers Ave., Apt. 4D
Brooklyn, NY 11216 Tel: 917-385-9867
Fax: 718-778-3181
St. Helena Independent
23 March 2012
The St Helena Independent to Close Down
The Island’s Most Successful Newspaper is Killed Off – Saint FM to continueThe Independent, St Helena’s only private sector newspaper in modern times, will have to close after
next week’s issue. The Independent, also the Island’s most successful newspaper is closing against its
will; there is no other choice.The reasons are;· The Independent cannot compete on a commercial basis with the new heavily subsidised government
backed media organisation· The new government backed media will charge low advertising rates because they are subsidised.
The price charged for every copy is much lower than the true cost because they
are subsidised. The St Helena Independent cannot compete against this unfair competition.· The low advertising rates and the low charge for buying the new newspaper will not cover the government
backed newspaper’s staff and printing costs. The St Helena Independent cannot compete
against this. It will be a constant uphill struggle and doomed to failure.· The St Helena Independent has to set charges to cover all its costs; if it does not, it makes a loss
and will build up debt more debt week after week.· WORST OF ALL, IT IS UNDERSTOOD THE ST HELENA GOVERNMENT WILL NOT BE PLACING
ANY ADVERTISING WITH THE ST HELENA INDEPENDENT AFTER ITS OWN NEWSPAPER
STARTS NEXT WEEK. IT WILL ONLY ADVERTISE IN THE NEWSPAPER IT IS BACKING
WITH BIG SUBSIDIES. THIS WILL REDUCE THE MONEY MADE BY THE ST HELENA INDEPENDENT
TO PAY ITS BILLS.· The only newspaper in St Helena in modern times which has existed free of government influence
and government money is now being killed off because of the actions of government.
EDITORIALThe future of the St Helena Independent has been in doubt for
the last few months. Ever since details of the final plans for
made for the new government subsidised media trickled out
of The Castle, bit by bit, it has looked increasingly bad for the
future of ANY private sector media in St Helena.It is certainly true The Independent has had a difficult relationship
with the St Helena government. Difficult relationships
between the Press and the State in democratic countries are
a common thing, in fact, often the usual thing. It is not the
usual thing for the state to take actions which are certain to
kill off the free press; except in the communist countries and
countries ruled by dictators.In setting up a new subsidised media the St Helena government
has made a mockery of several of its own much publicised
polices and grand pronouncements.Untargeted SubsidiesRemember the big talk about changing
the way government subsidies are handed out so that only
those who genuinely need them actually receive them. Well,
all that has been ignored. The government are throwing many,
many thousands of pounds at a new media organisation which
it is not absolutely necessary to have, while people on low
incomes continue to wait for the government to finish their
assessment of what welfare benefits should really be.Promoting the Private SectorWe have been on the receiving
end of all sorts of government talk over a long period of time
about building up the Island’s private sector. The government’s
policy says it is to sell off some of its own activities to private
sector interests. Websites and news media around the world
are picking up on the story about St Helena welcoming investors
to the Island in advance of the airport opening. Government
help to build up the private sector has been talked about
for several years and has still not come up to much. Any
overseas investor thinking of putting money into St Helena
should look long and hard at the history of private sector efforts
to get a real economy going here. Thornton and Timmreck
are two resounding examples. Now we can add The St Helena
Independent to the list of examples which show how little regard
is given to the private sector in St Helena.DemocracyGovernment press releases often refer to democratic
processes, consultation, good governance and the rest.Democracy is much more than electing councillors every few
years. Democratic action is a daily thing and has to be shown
to be in action. One important part of it is that those in power
have to be able to take criticism and argue their case openly
and honestly. In the UK there is not just Her Majesty’s Government;
there is Her Majesty’s Opposition. Here in St Helena
there are too many instances through the years of opposition
to government not being tolerated and there is no change in
sight.Enjoy the rest of this week’s Independent. We will carry on
as we always have done for the short time that is left for this
newspaper. Remember, Saint FM will remain on the air 24
hours a day and we look forward to continuing to entertain
and inform you when you tune in to 93.1. More on this next
week Each man’s death diminishes me,
For I am involved in mankind.
Therefore, send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee. John Donne
Climate Skeptics
Tennessee passes anti-climate, anti-evolution ‘education’ bill
Good news for people who don’t know shit about dick: You can now teach science in Tennessee! The state legislature has passed a bill saying that if “science” “teachers” don’t personally believe in evolution or climate change, they’re free to represent them to students as kooky conjecture. Because forcing teachers to teach science is a form of fascism! Or socialism! I don’t know the difference, I took political science in Tennessee.
It’s possible that Tennessee legislators, who to be fair did take math in Tennessee, got confused and thought it was 1912, 13 years before the Scopes Trial in that very same state started the process of undermining laws against teaching evolution. Or maybe Tennessee is finally chafing under the yoke of science, and rebelling against the obligation to live in the same reality as the rest of us. If it’s the latter, I’m hoping for some very entertaining new laws as the legislators continue to snap. Next on the docket in Tennessee:
- Biology teachers who don’t believe in premarital sex are free to teach students that animals have tiny but elegant weddings before they breed.
- History teachers with elaborate conspiracy theories may spend up to 12 weeks of the semester doing nothing but screening the Zapruder film over and over and chain-smoking.
- Writing teachers may opt for phonetic spelling, and are not required to mention the existence of socialist tome The Dictionary.
- Literature teachers are free to teach that Shakespeare was actually Francis Bacon. Ha ha, just kidding! Who the hell are THOSE guys?
Sent from my iPhone in MIA
One of the most successful of the ~1800 photos I took on 2 week trip ending today! (I'm hoping that's a joke.) That's an endemic Cuban Green Parrot in the tree. . . one of 23 endemic species we saw on the trip.
Sent from my iPhone in MIA